Showing posts with label Horror film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Horror film. Show all posts

Friday, November 19, 2010

Fright Flix presents - "Carnival of Souls (1962)"


Atmospheric 60s B-horror film with a cult following.
Mary Henry is enjoying the day by riding around with two friends but everything goes wrong when challenged to a drag race and their car gets forced off of a bridge. The car sinks into the murky depths, and all three women are assumed drowned. Some time later Mary emerges unscathed from the river. She tries to start a new life by becoming a church organist but Mary finds herself haunted by a ghostly figure that instills fear and dread into her.





While Carnival of Souls will never make the mainstream lists of best "horror" movies, I think it is a masterpiece. You have to look at this film in context: it was purportedly made on a shoestring budget and with a small crew. Yet, the photography and music is superb. Note the parallel imagery of the bridge arches and the church arches, for one example and, as another example, the intrusion of the decadent carnival waltz on the spiritual organ piece, juxtaposing the competing dynamics of the new and frightening dimension Mary finds herself thrust into.

This film is notable in its capacity to create an eerie, otherworldy atmosphere with limited resources. It also features some subtle humour, even though I don't think it was meant to be funny overall. The first element of humour is introduced when Mary tries to clear the theme music from her car radio- quite funny.

What is very effective also is the contrast between the rusticity of the setting, in an ordinary town of ordinary people, and the developing strangeness of Mary's personal world.

The horror itself is developed through the medium of dread; dread that a person can be caught somewhere between life and death, in a perverse reality. No gory or blood-drenched horror film can match the mood of sheer desolation in Carnival of Souls. This is a psychological rather than physical expression of horror, describing the experience of something like purgatory; of a person having her emotional and physical attachment to the world inexorably stripped away.

Mary is emotionally and spiritually dead and only the memory of shopping can bring her to something like human feeling: a woman's ultimate refuge! Yes, there is sardonic humour in this scenario. Sadly, though, for our Mary, there is no refuge, not even in shopping.

Mary Henry is faced with an excrutiating dilemma: go with the (apparently) normal living people, whom she can no longer relate to emotionally or even physically, or go with the dead, whom she is repulsed by. Deciding at last to join the dead is a decision she makes out of a sense of inevitability, having seen her unwanted suitor, Mr Linden, transform into the dead man who had been following her everywhere. Yet this choice is truly horrifying, and, realising that, she attempts to flee the dancing dead - in vain, as it turns out.

There is the element of dark humour again, in that both a living man and a dead man want the same thing: to dance with her and have sex with her. Mary no longer shares the sexual tensions of the living but is strangely attracted to the derelict carnival site where the dead man hangs out. Macabre but brilliant!

In the final analysis, any path our doomed heroine chooses leads to an unwanted outcome - and this is surely the ultimate horror any of us could face.

Or, to put it another way, no matter how solid you think your world is, the last joke is always on you.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Fright Flix presents - "Plan 9 from Outer Space". (1958)


Flying saucers over Hollywood! People in panic! Yes, dear friends, aliens have rather indiscreetly shown themselves to the public, and they're fighting mad. Humanity is filled with morons and that makes Earth dangerous. In order to stop us from developing sun-exploding superweapons, the aliens reanimate three corpses as part of their ninth plan.







Plan 9 from Outer Space flies in the face of all conventional wisdom. How can a film this incompetently produced feel so good? Edward D. Wood, Jr. gives the world another truly great bad cinematic experience and it must be celebrated.
The genius of the film lays mainly in the script. The plot itself is convoluted and ridiculous, but it's the dialogue that tickles the ear. People mangle adverbs, dodge specifics, and raise the bar for obvious statements. There's dozens of gems to choose from, but my favorite is still "You see? You see? You're stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!"
Low production values also enhance Plan 9's enjoyability. An airplane cockpit is nothing more than a couple of chairs and a curtained doorway. Gravestones get knocked about like the cardboard they really are. Stock footage is liberally applied everywhere. Plan 9 is a bit too ambitious in its scope for its meager budget, and it really shows.
The Ed Wood Irregulars compose the majority of the cast. Tor Johnson essays the role of a lumbering brute with all the panache of his other lumbering brutes. Tom Keene and Duke Moore capture the manly bluster of Woodian heroes. Vampira (as Ghoul Woman) and Criswell (who introduces and narrates the film) make fine additions to the troupe.
Sadly, this is the last film appearance of horror legend Bela Lugosi. The footage wasn't even shot for Plan 9. It was for another project that fell through with Bela's death. Wood cobbled the scraps of film together and tried to construct a plotline out of the silent footage (most of which was simply Bela stalking around in his Dracula duds). The rest of his part was portrayed by Tom Mason, a chiropractor of greater height. Mason's resemblance to Lugosi apparently ends just below the eyes, as he spends the movie with the bottom half of his face covered by a cape.
Shockingly, Wood's actual direction is fairly competent. It's no worse than a dozen other contemporary science fiction films, anyway. Wood pushes in with the camera for dramatic moments and usually keeps his subjects well-framed. There are a few weird, unnecessary moments, but otherwise the pacing is solid.
Fans of "Mystery Science Theater 3000" know what to with a film such as this: heckle. I myself have developed a regular routine of catchphrases and snarky commentary that I shout out when watching. Gather a bunch of friends together, pop Plan 9 in, and have a lot of fun. You won't regret it.

Friday, November 5, 2010

Fright Flix presents - "Werewolf in a Girls' Dormitory"! (1962)


I have a confession to make – I love cheesy old movies. I’m not talking the coming attractions for old Universal or Hammer movies here. I mean the real stuff, authentic schlock: ‘50s Sci-Fi, ‘60s Horror and Spaghetti Westerns, ‘70s Blaxploitation and Kung Fu pictures. Still, watching these delightful cinematic artifacts is a bittersweet experience. It compels one to dwell on how boring movies have become in the last couple of decades.





The powers-that-be that allowed such films to flourish developed an amusing, but effective system. First of all, the producers would first come up with a marketable title. Then the poster art would be created around said title. Next the poster art would be run by film distributors. Only if they showed interest in booking such a film would the actual movie be written and produced, resulting in films like The Beast With A Million Eyes (1955) and I Married A Monster From Outer Space (1958). Of course, such titles are still being produced, but now it’s for camp value, like Snakes On A Plane (2006), Kids Go Into The Woods, Kids Get Dead (2009), or The Lights Have Gone Out, Let’s Split Up. In our enlightened era such titles are uttered with tongue firmly implanted in-cheek. Not so in the golden era, back when the films tended to be a straightforward presentation of what the title promised.

Arguably, one of the greatest of such titles was Werewolf in a Girl’s Dormitory. It’s all there, isn’t it? In terms of boiling down the traditional lures of violence and sex into one short formulation, it’s perfect. The movie itself is one of those monster/cheesecake flicks ground out in early ‘60s Europe. Such films as Playgirls and the Vampire or Horrors of Spider Island would mix scantily clad hotties and mayhem. Served up, it should be noted, with somewhat greater explicitness than their contemporary American counterparts. Soon after this European films would become more unabashed, presenting nudity, sex and gore so perverse as to cross over into misogyny and misanthropy. (Although more of the former than of the latter.) In the brief period that we will now examine, though, the films remained oddly innocent. Buxom gals meandering around in elaborate, none-too-revealing lingerie and being rather chastely mauled by goofy monsters was the order of the day.
 
Other common elements of these flicks are on display here as well. For instance, there’s the mystery element to be found in all those German Edgar Wallace adaptations. You know, the ones starring Klaus Kinski and featuring hunchbacked, hooded killers decapitating hordes of victims and that sort of thing. (When did they stop showing those on TV?) So pretty much every character in our movie is constantly acting in a suspicious manner. This is so as to keep us guessing at the werewolf’s identity. It also means that the werewolf could be pretty much anybody with equal validity. Therefore, the only practical way to figure out who it is to wait until everyone but the hero, the heroine and the villain have been killed off.

Next, of course, there’s the stilted, poorly dubbed-in dialog. For the connoisseur, each region of the world’s dubbing has its own charms. The most famous here in the States is the Americanized dubbing as seen in old Godzilla movies. The Japanese language doesn’t really match up well with English in terms of meter. Hence the much-remarked upon and obvious mis-syncing of dialog to lip movement. Japanese speech also tends to be much more terse than its American counterpart. This is what causes so many affirmative ‘hmm’s and stuff to be looped in, replacing the original ‘hei’s.

On the other extreme are films from Mexico, like those translated by our old friend K. Gordon Murray. Unlike the Japanese, Mexican films tend to be extraordinarily dialog heavy. This is at least in part because nothing’s cheaper than having actors stand around and talk. Mexican Spanish also tends to be spoken at a quicker cadence than English. Even better, the dubbed dialog in films like The Brainiac or Santa Claus often sounds like it was translated directly from the original Spanish. This results in long, wordy exchanges in which the grammar is humorously askew.

The rhythm of language in German and Italian films, with this being the latter, tends to be closer to American English. Yet while all the typical dubbing quirks in this picture might be (wait for it) less pronounced (ha, I’m so funny), they are still identifiable. Spoken dialog regularly mismatches lip movements. The volume of speech seems just a shade too loud, as if everyone thought everybody else a bit hard of hearing. Long, inexplicable pauses abound, often in mid-sentence. And the dialog tends to sound overly stiff and formalistic.

I have a some affection for this film, and consider to be a bit of a minor gem. For instance, the film runs a scant 83 minutes (although the missing song indicates a greater length), so there’s little time to get boring. Also, the filmmakers do put in some work. The picture supplies a comically large assemblage of werewolf suspects and makes sure that everybody’s acting suspiciously at all times. This is augmented by the nearly continuous playing of the ‘menacing’ score throughout the first half of the movie. The stilted dubbed dialog helps. As does the pacing. The film keeps getting progressively sillier with admirable momentum, climaxing in the hilarious lab scene where Leonor keeps getting mauled like a character out of a Monty Python sketch.

There’s a couple of obvious and amusing plot holes, too. For instance, how did Swift become a werewolf? When? Was he killing folks before the events shown here and nobody noticed? Actually, considering the quality of the local police, this seems possible. Again, what possible motive could Sheena have had not to blow Swift’s cover? And why didn’t the police ever search Mary’s effects? And why were they so sure Priscilla was lying about the letter? Was Swift supposed to know he was a werewolf? Isn’t it a little weird that of the bountiful six corpses the film provides, only one was the work of the werewolf?

Ahh, what’s not to love?

Friday, October 1, 2010

"Fright Flix" presents- City of the Dead/Horror Hotel (1960)


"This excellent exercise in atmosphere -- about a New England town ruled by a coven of witches -- falls just short of greatness thanks to an excessive reliance on horror movie clichés (e.g., sinister residents of said town staring ominously at the hapless protagonists). Yet while the lack of subtlety and refinement relegate the film to the ranks of entertaining spook shows (rather than genre classics), the four-star level of weirdness earns HORROR HOTEL a place alongside the most memorable cult movies ever made. On top of that, it sports what may be the best, most terrifying (happy) ending ever seen in a horror film -- a genuine tour-de-force that is so powerful in its imagery that it almost single-handedly erases any reservations one has about the rest of the movie."






On 3 March 1692, in Whitewood, Massachusetts, the witch Elizabeth Selwyn is sentenced to be burned at the stake, and her partner Jethrow Keane asks Lúcifer to save her. About three hundred years later, the college student Nan Barlow decides to spend her vacation in the town to research witchcraft. Her professor Alan Driscoll suggests Nan to lodge in the Ravens Inn, managed by Mrs. Newless. Once in the village, the naive Nan is advised by the local priest, Reverend Russell, to immediately leave the place, where devil has ruled over for three hundred years, but she decides to stay and find that she is in a coven of evil witches. Nan vanishes, and the granddaughter of Reverend Russell, Patricia Russell, pays a visit to Nan's skeptical brother, Richard Barlow, and her boyfriend Bill Maitland, and they decide to follow her steps. Once in New England, they realize that a group of immortal witches have to sacrifice two beautiful women per year, one on Candleman Eve on February 1st, and the other on the Witch Sabbath, to stay alive forever, and only the shadow of a cross would be able to destroy them.

Friday, September 17, 2010

"Fright Flix" presents- It's Alive! (1969)

'It's Alive!' is an American film directed by Larry Buchanan and originally released in 1969. It's about a mad farmer who tries to feed a stranded couple to a dinosaur he keeps in a cave. Not to be confused with 'It's Alive!' that was released in 1974 which is an American horror film written, produced, and directed by Larry Cohen and is about a couple's infant child turns out to be a vicious mutant monster that kills when frightened.








I was a kid who loved monster movies, and from about the age of 7 I started collecting books and magazines about film monsters. I had heard about a movie called It's Alive, which had a man-eating monster baby in it, and from that moment I really, really wanted to see it.
I was about 11 when read in our local Detroit TV guide that It's Alive was going to be on the cleverly titled Sammy Terry. Sammy Terry was a late night "Horror Movie" show that aired on our local telivision station and featured horror movies.
I was excited to finally see the infamous man-eating baby, and thankfully I had parents that didn't mind me staying up late on a non-school night.
To sophisticated adult eyes it's pretty clear from the opening titles that It's Alive 1969 is not a movie featuring a man-eating baby, but I was a ignorant kid, and the titles read "It's Alive" so I was sure I'd be see some man-eating baby action soon.
I struggled to stay awake thru this HORRORble b-movie reject, only to be rewarded by the sight of the super phony cave monster. The cave monster was like a dime store version of the Gill Man, and had what looked to be ping-pong balls for eyes and soda straws for teeth.
I stayed up thru the entire movie fully expecting the man-eating baby to make it's appearance at any minute. After the end credits ran I had one of the most intense feelings of disappointment that I had ever had in my entire young life.
I soon learned there were two movies titled It's Alive, and it was It's Alive 1974 which featured the baby.
To save any of you from experiencing such disappointment I will tell you now that tonight's feature is not the movie about the flesh eating baby but rather the other, none the less cheesey and entertaining, movie by Larry Buchannan.
Larry Buchannan makes Ed Wood look like Preston Sturges but to his credit he conned his way into making more films and having them bought and seen on late night than Wood ever dreamt of.
If you've seen Zontar The Thing From Venus or Curse Of THe Swamp Creature you've basically seen the monster in one form or another since they're all culled from the same suit. One has a top fin,one doesn't,one is just a mask and hands and another is a full suit. Although the creature here is supposed to be a dinosaur man you don't get the feeling that it's supposed to be twenty feet tall until the mad farmer tells you it's twenty feet tall.
As others have stated this is solely a flick for those that are into cinematic badness and seeing every monster movie possible no matter what.The flashback scenes of torture with the chasing and the whistle wake ups are indeed a hilarious highlight.

Friday, August 27, 2010

Fright Flix presents "Them!" (1954)

I remember sitting in front of the old floor model Zenith television with my nose no more than two inches from the glass picture tube, a 16 oz. glass bottle of Pepsi in one hand and the other hand elbow deep in a bowl of buttery popcorn as I watched in mesmerized terror as giant ants terrorized the tiny humans! I couldn't help but to think of all of those ant hills that I had crushed on neighborhood sidewalks, with a creeping sense of guilt and fear, as I watched the huge radio-active monstrosities toss full grown men around like the plastic soldiers upon a backyard battlegrounds and the sandy dunes of the playground sandbox. The movie was simply called "Them!" and I was hooked from the opening credits to the last line. This movies is pure classic sci-fi/horror bliss!
 (If you experience any problems watching the last part just watch it on the Anti-Society YouTube channel!)
After several people in the New Mexico desert wind up missing or dead, including an F.B.I. agent and most of his family, police Sgt. Ben Peterson teams up with F.B.I. agent Bob Graham to find out what's causing the strange occurrences. They find send a strange print found at one of the crime scenes and it is sent to the Department of Agriculture. Doctor Harold Medford and his daughter Doctor Patricia Medford arrive and ask to be taken to the scene of some of the disappearances. When they get there they are shocked to find gigantic ants, whose mutations were caused by the first atomic bomb explosion nine years earlier. They manage to destroy the nest of ants, but not before two winged queen ants and a couple of drones have hatched and escaped the nest. Now it is a race against time to find the two queen ants before they can establish more nests and hatch more queens.